In an obvious concession to the far-left, President Barack Obama has taken the first step to closing the terrorist detention center at Guantanamo Bay.Closing Gitmo "would further the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States and the interests of justice," read the draft executive order, a copy of which was leaked to The Associated Press.
The most obvious question is what will happen to the 245 al-Qaida and Taliban members capture on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan?
Will Obama release them so they can kill more Americans? Will he bring them back to the continental United States? Where will they be housed?
And the broader question Obama has failed to answer: How does the closing make America safer?
"Guantanamo and the incarceration and interrogation of its inhabitants have saved thousands of American lives and untold tragedy," Investor's Business Daily wrote in a recent editorial. "While it has existed, America's enemies have had a harder time plying their trade."
I haven't heard too many members of Congress volunteer to accept the terrorists in their home states once Gitmo is closed.
I have a couple of suggestions for where to move the 245 terrorists, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks.
My first option would be the Yucca Mountain salt mines the government spent billions of dollars tunneling out to store spent nuclear fuel rods. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has blocked the use of Yucca Mountain for its intended purposes. How could Reid object to housing terrorists in Nevada? It's safer than nuclear waste, right Harry?
Another possibility is California, preferably the home district of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, who owns vast vineyards. Pelosi could sponsor a work-release program putting the terrorists to work picking grapes.
As for housing them, I'm sure the Hollywood community would embrace their al-Qaida and Taliban brethren. Sean Penn, Barbra Steisand, Tim Robbins and the rest of the Hollywood left could take in the Gitmo prisoners.
If those two options don't suit Obama and the Democrats, how about turning the terrorists loose in the Chicago area? Obama spoke of shared sacrifice in his inaugural address. He can do his part.
3 comments:
Now that the question is, "where do they go", how about the Antarctic peninsula? No country has jusrisdiction. Let them survive on penguins and fish. In fact, how about that place as a dumping ground for all Islamic terrorists?
John, to narrow the use of that to Islamic people only would be a huge red flag on racism. I say that all persons convicted of terrorism be treated equally. ;)
It's BLEEDING HEARTS like Anonymous here that would let Islamic Hitler types come into power because they have rights...
These soft Demmies, JUST DON'T GET IT !!!
Post a Comment