The new rankings of Pennsylvania's "Most Influential Political blogs" is out. There was a lot of movement on the list this week, but liberal sites continue to dominate, which either means the left is taking control of the Internet (like they control the mainstream media) or they've figured out a way to stack the deck in the way the list is compiled.
You'll find Tony Phyrillas in the Top 10 for the second week in a row and Top 20 for the fourth week in a row. If you eliminate all the liberal sites, Tony Phyrillas is the No. 2 most influential conservative site in Pennsylvania, right behind the granddady of blogs, GrassrootsPA.com
Tony Phyrillas continues to hold the top spot in the 2007 cumulative rankings by readers of BlogNetNews.com, so give the readers some credit for recognizing quality.
Here's how the top blogs in Pennsylvania fell into place this week:
Nobody is really sure how the rankings are determined, but this is the explanation on the BlogNetNews' Web site: BNN's Pennsylvania Blogosphere Influence Rating combines a variety of data sets to determine which blogs are most powerfully influencing the direction of the Pennsylvania political blogosphere. The exact method BNN uses to calculate influence scores must remain proprietary in order to prevent attempts to game the system. BNN's methodology takes into account the fact that all Internet data is profoundly limited in its reliability by using multiple data sets that, when combined, reveal a fair picture of activity in the blogosphere.
6 comments:
they've figured out a way to stack the deck in the way the list is compiled.
You're not too pararnoid now, are you??? Actually, it's a big liberal conspiracy. Really! We even have a secret handshake and a secret signal we give each other when we're driving. We tail all conservatives, drive thm into road rage and laugh as the cops cart them away.
Top ten political blogger in PA and there are practically no comments to his posts.
I think I might know why the liberal sites are doing better. People are hungry for truth, and for people to speak truth to power, not more shills like Phyrillas. I mean, shit, he still goes on about the liberal media. Even Bill Kristol admitted that was a dead issue and a lie all along.
Your movement is dead, Phyrillas. George Bush, Cheney, and all the other Neo-cons laid it bare for all to see, and no one wants anymore of it. I'm sure you'll continue to post your lies and write your distorted op-eds in The Mercury, but fewer and fewer people will be listening. Thank goodness for that.
I have my own theory about the lack of comments at this site.
I'm always right, so what's there to say?
Liberals know to stay away because I'm not interested in what they're selling.
Everyone else agrees with me.
What you say is true enough. Liberals have big mouths so they can't resist adding their two cents even when it is cumlative. If they all run around patting each other on the back, they boost their numbers. This is probably the third time I've responded on a blog in my life. I see no reason to write something in response just to say I agree with the blog. I'm a conservative; I have better things to do.
As the Muslim who burned down the library at Alexandria is rumored to have said: "Either the books were contrary to the Koran and therefore heretical, or in agreement with it and therefore superfluous."
If you visit liberal or conservative blogs that have any traffic, you'll see that there is always someone posting a comment, for or against. In fact, most of the time it's the choir that's being preached to that chimes in with kudos or to add something of its own. You see, Tony, your theory about the lack of comments on your site falls just as flat as your political theories.
Sorry Roy, I'm going to have to go with John on this one. Liberals just want to hear themselves talk. And they keep repeating the same drivel to each other until they all believe it. And if you seriously believe the media is not controlled by the left, you're too far gone to reason with.
Post a Comment