Monday, September 29, 2008


The stock market plunged today on news that the $700 billion bailout plan was defeated in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Last time I checked, the Democratic Party had the majority in the House. Last time I checked Nancy Pelosi was the Speaker. How do the Democrats explain the fact that 40 percent of their caucus rejected the bailout plan?

Why would you allow a vote on a bill unless you knew it was going to pass? If Nancy Pelosi knew that more than 90 Democrats were going to vote "No" why hold a vote?

The Democrats in the House are the gang that couldn't shoot straight.

Since the roots of the current financial mess can be traced to Democrats (going back to Bill Clinton) why would anyone in their right mind think Democrats can solve the problem?

America does need change. It needs to unload the Democrats who have run Congress over the past two years.


Brian G in Upper Uwchlan said...


You're a complete fraud. When you reference the "liberal media" and make them out to be villians, aren't you villifying yourself? Aren't you apart of the media, or do you find yourself to be beyond the liberal media?

When did the term "liberal" become so awful? One would think conservatism would be "the dirty word", considering it's meaning is to preserve what is established; opposition to change; the habit of mind; or conduct, of a conservative.

You offer nothing new, nor do you believe anything should change. The reason why we study history is to not repeat past mistakes. One thing we've learned as a civilization (at least some of us, wink wink) is that if the species doesn't evolve/adapt/accept change, we die.

So do us all a favor. If you're going to chastize your profession again, put a disclaimer at the bottom that says "I'm against change. I love the status quo." Otherwise, don't make reference to the term if you're unwilling to accept responsibility for their actions.

NEPAConseravtive said...

T, Here is all you need to know.